I disagree with the acknowledgement of the right of the human clone for some reasons.

First, if humans acknowledge the right of the human clones, serious problems can happen. For example, our safety can be threatened.

If we acknowledge the right of the human clones, they might rise in rebellion. As they can think, they have same or better physical conditions and they can also use weapons, there is no way to prevent them from hurting human beings.

Second, a serious disorder will occur. If the right of the human clones is acknowledged, human clones may attempt to live in our society. So imagine that identical people are in your both side. They argues about who is original human. Then it is a great confusion.

Third, the economical value of the human clones will be diminish. Humans make them to use them as a tool. Actually I disagree with the existence of human clones, but since it is an assumption that human clones exist, we should use them in a profitable ways. But once we acknowlege the right of the human clones, we can't use them in a way such as organ harvesting.

All of these reasons are based on human-first concept. That is, I disagree with the acknowledgement of the right of the human clones cuz that can harm people.